Nikolay Barinov Rosreestr. Thieving henchman Nikolai Barinov

Major ex-officials of the penal system are detained in Russia for bribes. What to expect from the FSIN - reorganization or collapse?

In St. Petersburg on Monday, November 6, former deputy head of the Federal Penitentiary Service Nikolai Barinov was detained. He was placed under arrest until December 31, reports a correspondent for The Moscow Post. But, as it became known, he will immediately go to the hospital at the pre-trial detention center due to diabetes.

Barinov was detained because of a bribery case - he received no less than 110 million rubles. He received this money for signing documents on work on the construction of the St. Petersburg pre-trial detention center "Kresty-2". The head of Petroinvest, Ruslan Khamkhokov, and the general director of the General Construction Corporation, Viktor Kudrin, gave him 55 million rubles each.

Barinov held the position of deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service from 2005 to 2009, then “quietly” resigned of his own free will. It was at this time that he oversaw the construction of Krestov-2 in Kolpino, the largest pre-trial detention center in Europe. And, apparently, having received a multimillion-dollar bribe (and not the fact that its size is limited to 110 million, or that this amount was the only one), he decided that there was nothing more to catch in the department - and joyfully went home with a large sum of money in his bosom.

That's the cross!

"Crosses-2" has become a truly large-scale project. And no, we are not talking about the scale of the construction, but about the scale of the waste of budget funds formed on the site of the future pre-trial detention center. During the entire construction period, which is constantly being delayed, its cost has tripled and now exceeds 12 billion rubles!

But the biographies of the officials behind the construction of Europe’s largest detention center are not only filled with tidy sums. After all, things have already reached the point of murder: the St. Petersburg project curator, colonel of the internal service, deputy head of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the region, Sergei Moiseenko, was accused of murdering a subordinate. Nikolay Chernov held the position of head of the department for technical supervision and operation of construction sites of the Federal Penitentiary Service for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region. He was shot at point-blank range by a killer.

The reason for the murder could have been the same money cut: Chernov could have known something about Moiseenko, who is also suspected of receiving a bribe from builders in the amount of 350 million rubles. Or about violations amounting to 425 million rubles, which were revealed by auditors from Moscow during a construction inspection. Or about something else that the investigation does not yet know about.

In addition, the heads of both development companies are now under arrest: Ruslan Khamkhokov is suspected of giving a bribe to Moiseenko, and Viktor Kudrin is suspected of embezzlement during construction totaling about 56 million rubles.

Is Barinov one of the few who will have to pay for Kresty-2?

Now just think about it! The construction has been going on for ten years and will drag on for some more: the completion date is now set at December 1, 2017, but something tells us that the opening of the detention center will not take place this year. Or maybe it won’t open its doors to prisoners in 2018: who knows how long Gennady Kornienko’s department will be able to delay the construction of “Crosses” and mercilessly launder money on it?

Tricks in the Urals

But, unfortunately, the authority of the department does not end with the construction of pre-trial detention centers in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region. And confirmation of this is the glory of the Federal Penitentiary Service outside central Russia. In Kurgan, on November 2, the day Barinov was detained, the former head of the regional FSIN Ilgiz Ilyasov was also “grabbed by the tail.” He is involved in four criminal cases of bribery and one of abuse of power.

According to investigators, Ilyasov was also paid by builders - for general patronage and work provided, and this included several construction projects of the department and the construction of a house for the son of an official. We are talking about two companies, one of which is Moscow. The amounts of bribes, however, are quite small - within 100 thousand rubles. Why did a high-ranking FSIN employee take such “small things”? Or will everything work in the kulak economy?

A more interesting case is the abuse of power: Ilyasov is suspected of illegally spending budget funds totaling 10 million rubles. Money was allocated to his department for the construction of a house for employees and pensioners in the village of Ikovka. According to Ilyasov himself, the problem is that he gave the money to the contractors in 2012, but they built the house only a year later.

At the same time, Ilyasov is trying to shield himself by accusing his other employees of giving false testimony. In May 2017, when a case of a bribe of 250 thousand rubles was opened against his deputy Dmitry Shumilov, the ex-head of the regional department immediately stated: Shumilov gave false testimony against him and the chief accountant of the Federal Penitentiary Service.

Ilgiz Ilyasov was able to “solve matters.” Until some time

It would seem that two regions throughout Russia are not an indicator. And if somewhere employees of the Federal Penitentiary Service actually stole, then these are exceptional cases. But if you look a little deeper, it becomes clear that officials of this system appear in scandals much more often than others...

Take bribe takers

An interesting story with the now former head of the Federal Penitentiary Service took place in Tatarstan. FSB officers very gently asked Daufit Hamadishin to leave his chair back in 2014, but he refused to get up. As a result, the result of this secret war was the revelation of corruption schemes in his department.

The head of IK-10 in Tatarstan, Fail Karimov, was arrested for a bribe, followed by seven more colony employees. All of them became involved in 20 criminal cases initiated on 96 episodes! Employees of other colonies also suffered: in total, four of them appeared in the bribery story. Moreover, the heads of the penal colony took money both for parole or improvement of conditions for specific convicts, and for all the same construction and repairs.

Another story came out in the Kuzbass State Administration of the Federal Penitentiary Service: they recently extended the arrest period of the head of the department, Konstantin Antonkin. He is suspected of receiving a bribe on an especially large scale. But he didn’t take her with money, but with a cottage in an elite village!

It is noteworthy that Antonkin received the land and house in connection with the construction of... another pre-trial detention center! The general offered the commercial company a government contract in exchange for real estate. As a result, 42 million rubles were spent on the design, but the result did not pass the state examination: the isolator literally hung in the air, and the enterprise that carried out the state order entered the liquidation stage. But Antonkin stayed with the house.

Led by Kornienko

As a result, the situation around the FSIN system in Russia is similar to the fact that the agency is simply falling apart piece by piece, and what does not fall apart on its own is being taken away by its leaders. And it seems that the head of this whole bacchanalia, Gennady Kornienko, has finally lost control of the situation: his local leaders are taking bribes en masse and making money wherever there is a chance of even the slightest profit.

Over the five years under Kornienko, has everything only gotten worse at the FSIN?

This is not only construction: the deputy head of the Federal Penitentiary Service, Oleg Korushnov, was arrested for creating a monopoly on food for prisoners. Through the federal state unitary enterprise he created, he laundered money and inflated food prices by 1.5 times, pocketing the difference.

And the former head of the Federal Penitentiary Service Alexander Reimer and his deputy Nikolai Krivolapov, for example, stole 3.4 billion budget rubles from the purchase of faulty bracelets at inflated prices.

And this is if we talk only about corruption, because regular beatings and suicides in Russian colonies have also become the norm - and what is this if not an indicator of the work of the head of the department and his subordinates?

The joke that “Crosses - 2” is being built for so long and conscientiously, because “for themselves,” is already ceasing to be a joke: who knows, maybe one day Barinov will be transferred there or Mr. Kornienko will finally be sent?

Nikolay Barinov

Retired deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service and current adviser to the head of Rosreestr Nikolai Barinov was detained on November 2 in Moscow. He is suspected of receiving bribes worth 110 million rubles at his previous place of work.

As Fontanka learned, the detention of Nikolai Barinov by employees of the central office of the FSB took place within the framework of a criminal case about giving and receiving bribes during the construction of the Kresty-2 pretrial detention center in St. Petersburg. According to investigators, Barinov, who held the post of deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service and oversaw a project worth 12 billion rubles since 2007, entered into a criminal conspiracy with the director of the general subcontractor Petroinvest, Ruslan Khamkhokov, and the deputy head of the Federal Penitentiary Service of St. Petersburg and the region, Sergei Moiseenko, to steal government money. As follows from the case materials, announced earlier at court hearings to select preventive measures for Khamkhokov and Moiseenko, after the funds were transferred to the Petroinvest account, part of them was cashed out and transferred directly to the bribe takers.

“According to the investigation, from May to August 2007, the suspect, while on the territory of St. Petersburg, informed the general director that for a monetary reward of at least 12 percent of each transfer of funds received to the companies’ bank account for the purpose of performing work on object, he will ensure the signing of the necessary documents on the work performed. Then, from October 2007 to December 2012, while in various places in St. Petersburg and Moscow, he repeatedly received bribes from the above-mentioned persons in the form of money in various amounts, and in total a total of at least 110 million rubles,” they reported today, November 2, at the Investigative Committee.

Nikolai Barinov’s heir in charge of Krestov-2, deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service Oleg Korshunov, was also detained and has already been arrested. Now he is accused of embezzlement during the purchase of fuels and lubricants in other regions.

As the press service of the St. Petersburg City Court reported, Khamkhokov was left under arrest until January 31, 2018. Sergei Moiseenko will be held in custody until February 1, 2018. He is accused not only of receiving a bribe, but also of organizing the murder of his subordinate Nikolai Chernov, who became aware of episodes of theft during the construction of Krestov-2.

According to Fontanka, Barinov’s arrest took place after Khamkhokov entered into a deal with the investigation. The businessman admitted transferring 350 million rubles to employees of the Federal Penitentiary Service, including Barinov.

In the status of an adviser to the head of Rosreestr, Nikolai Barinov declared 9.6 million rubles, a 130-meter apartment, Volkswagen Multivan, Renault Kangoo, Moskvich-407, and an all-terrain vehicle for 2016. His wife turned out to be wealthier. With an annual salary of just over a million rubles, she owns six plots of land with a total area of ​​eight thousand square meters, a residential building, three garages, an Audi A7, Jeep Grand Cherokee, and Nissan Murano.

Perhaps Nikolai Barinov will be transferred to St. Petersburg and a preventive measure will be chosen here. If Barinov is arrested, then, ironically, he, along with Ruslan Khamkhokov and Sergei Moiseenko, may become the first resident of the new detention center. The relocation of the contingent from Kresty to Arsenalnaya Embankment is scheduled for December 1, 2017.

The Kresty-2 pre-trial detention center has been under construction since 2007; the volume of budget investments amounts to 12 billion rubles. Vladimir Putin commissioned the construction of the new institution.

May 13th, 2013

The killer Oleg Topalov, who escaped from Sailor's Silence, was detained on May 8 in one of the city parks. During the arrest, the criminal himself did not even try to resist: according to him, he knew that there was nowhere to run, since the police and operatives of the Federal Penitentiary Service were on his trail and blocked all possible ways to escape from justice.

In order to understand the situation and understand who benefited from the organization of this event, it is enough to recall the previous case of a high-profile and, probably, the most daring escape from maximum security colony No. 17 in the Vologda region. Then Alexei Shestakov, convicted of murder, managed to escape using a helicopter, which suddenly appeared over the territory of the colony and also suddenly disappeared, taking the killer with him.

Both of these cases - Shestakov's escape by helicopter, and Topalov's escape using an ordinary aluminum spoon - could well become the plot for a Hollywood film. However, for a person even slightly familiar with the security system installed in our Russian prisons, both of these cases raise serious doubts.

However, escaping from a prison, which, in addition to the security system, is monitored by numerous guards around the clock, is only possible if the escape is organized with the help of high-ranking interested parties. And most likely, the reason for organizing such an event is the indignation on the part of the public, which will follow immediately after such a blatant fact of negligence on the part of those in charge.

By comparing the dates, we can obtain indirect confirmation of this assumption: the “helicopter” escape took place at a time when, as a source familiar with the situation said, internecine wars were taking place between the so-called “clans” within the department of the Federal Penitentiary Service (FSIN) of the Russian Federation. the then head of the department, Alexander Reimer, and his deputy, Eduard Petrukhin. This confrontation did not take place without the help of a number of interested media. For example, one of the Moscow newspapers, in most cases, was the first to publish information about all the failures that plagued the ex-head of the Federal Penitentiary Service. As a result, a series of events led to Reimer's resignation.

At the moment, as the FIC learned from a source in the department, the “clan” of Eduard Petrukhin is probably in a confrontation with the team of another deputy director of the FSIN, Vladislav Tsaturov.

At the same time, earlier information appeared in a number of media outlets that Eduard Petrukhin is highly respected among the criminal world, where he is even called the “patron of thieves in law.” The escaped criminal Oleg Topalov, as it became known, was part of one of the most brutal criminal groups, the Kurgan.

The scheme is simple: first, an escape is carried out, which in part even looks comical, and then a certain publication publishes material that tells in detail why such an escape became possible and who is to blame. At the same time, the entire process is controlled by persons interested, so to speak, in shaking up the situation and pursuing their own very specific goals.

In addition, if in the case of an escape from the zone by helicopter, all the blame can be placed on the IK officers, then in the case of Topalov, the latter was and is under strict operational control, which is carried out by the operational units of the Federal Penitentiary Service as part of the support of criminal cases against Topalov in court. Therefore, when conducting an internal audit and investigation of a criminal case initiated by the Ministry of Internal Affairs on the fact of an escape, it is necessary to take into account, among other things, the version of assistance in this escape from both the pre-trial detention center employees and the employees of the operational unit of the Federal Penitentiary Service.

Control by the operational units of the Federal Penitentiary Service is also indirectly confirmed by the imminent detention of Topalov. His “life” sentence will now probably be added to another 2-3 years, which will not decide anything for him, but in return, Topalov will most likely serve this term under special conditions or, as they say “over there,” “in chocolate.”

The so-called “thieves in law” feel quite at ease under the new leadership of the FSIN. Many of them, if desired, can choose the place to serve their sentence, and also, for a fee, serve part of the established term on sick leave.

The North Caucasus region is especially popular among thieves in law, as a source of the Analytics and Security Federal Research Center told the department, since, according to the source, any issues are easily resolved there.

According to the source, the leadership of the Federal Penitentiary Service cannot be unaware of the situation in the regions: employees loyal to the management are appointed to senior positions in regional operational management bodies, which makes it possible to control all thieves’ “gatherings.”

Those “thieves in law” who respect the leadership of the FSIN, according to a source in the department, occupy the status of “untouchables”: under their direct control, criminal schemes for the supply of drugs are established on the territory of correctional institutions.

Special equipment.

Based on the above facts, one of the most interesting and profitable areas for Petrukhin and his team could be the supply of special equipment to the North Caucasus region. It’s no secret that at the Federal Penitentiary Service this area was supervised by E. Petrukhin. Thus, according to available information, the Vystrel armored personnel carrier, produced on the KAMAZ basis at the plant in Naberezhnye Chelny, has been supplied to the North Caucasus region for a long time. According to unverified information, kickbacks from purchases by the “top” of the FSIN could range from 15% to 30% of the cost of the car. According to available information, those involved in this group handed over the cars to the militants, writing them off the balance sheet of the Federal Penitentiary Service for Rostov-on-Don as burnt out. The same thing could happen with other cars that the Federal Penitentiary Service purchased from 2007 to mid-2009.

Insurance.

An equally interesting area of ​​activity for E. Petrukhin, N. Barinov and the team was a financial scheme associated with the use of the functions of the Spasskie Vorota insurance company. According to available information, the essence of the possible fraudulent scheme was that all property and all funds of the Federal Penitentiary Service, in violation of Federal Law No. 94 (On placing orders for the supply of goods, performance of work, provision of services for state and municipal needs), were insured in violation of the rules for holding competitions, so to speak, “through pull”, by the insurance company “Spasskie Vorota” for a 20-30% kickback, depending on the objects of insurance. There is reason to believe that the Federal Penitentiary Service also purchased fuel and lubricants for budget funds through front companies, also “through cronyism” without taking into account the articles and provisions of Federal Law No. 94.

Food.

Of course, the Federal Research Center “Analytics and Security” could not ignore another way of possible criminal earnings on the part of the above-mentioned colleagues - the supply of food products. This scheme operated from 2007 to mid-2009. Presumably the delivery was carried out through the city of Saratov. According to available information, the essence of this criminal scheme was that the Federal State Institution “Department of Organization of Trade, Production and Supply of Food of the Federal Penitentiary Service” was purchasing possibly low-quality products. Budget funds (presumably 80%) allocated for the purchase of products went to the accounts of fly-by-night companies. This scheme could be supervised by E. Petrukhin’s fellow student Vitaly Arkadyevich Epshtein.

Naturally, this situation caused a lot of discontent among correctional officers. More detailed information on these issues can be found at the following links:

Between 2007 and mid-2009, the situation in correctional institutions improved significantly. The power of crime bosses in prisons was weakened. For example, they were deprived of the opportunity to communicate with representatives of the criminal world located outside these institutions. According to many crime authorities, most correctional institutions have become “frozen.” This suspended the activities of many criminal schemes, for example drug trafficking. What caused these changes? The firm position of Reimer and his team or the political will of V. Putin? It's not clear yet. But at present there are preconditions for the destruction of the beginnings of this reform.

18:26 — REGNUM

Former deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service (FSIN) of Russia, Nikolai Barinov, was detained on suspicion of receiving a bribe in the total amount of at least 110 million rubles. REGNUM news agency reported this on November 2 at the Main Investigation Department of the RF Investigative Committee for St. Petersburg.

A criminal case has been initiated against Barinov; he is charged with paragraph “d” of Part 4 of Article 290 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In 2007, Barinov oversaw the construction of a new detention center “Kresty-2” for 4 thousand places in the Kolpinsky district of St. Petersburg; the new pre-trial detention center, which has not yet been put into operation, should replace the famous “Kresty”.

According to investigators, from May to August 2007, Barinov informed the general directors of two city construction companies participating in the project that for 12% of each transfer of money from the budget he would “ensure that the necessary documents on the work performed are signed.”

“Then, from October 2007 to December 2012, while in various places in St. Petersburg and Moscow, he repeatedly received bribes from the above-mentioned persons in the form of money in various amounts, and in total a total of at least 110 million rubles,” reports the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee for Petersburg.

Barinov was detained with the help of FSB officers. The issue of choosing a preventive measure against him and bringing charges against him is now being decided.

This is not the first criminal case related to the construction of an expensive facility that cannot be put into operation.

"Crosses-2" was supposed to become the largest isolation center in Europe with humane standards - 7 square meters each. meters of living space per prisoner. The complex consists of 66 buildings, interconnected in such a way that you can move around them without going outside. It began to be built in 2007 on behalf of President Vladimir Putin, and the customer is the regional department of the Federal Penitentiary Service. The budget allocated 12 billion rubles for the new prison; the facility was supposed to be commissioned in 2015.

On March 2, 2017, on the highway in the village of Staraya - Kudrovo near St. Petersburg, the head of the technical supervision department of the Federal Penitentiary Service, Nikolai Chernov, was shot. The deceased 34-year-old lieutenant colonel spent the last months of his life working exclusively on the new mega-isolator. Investigators opened a criminal case and searched both Chernov’s office and apartment, studying all documents related to Kresty-2.

Two suspects were detained: Chernov's immediate superior, deputy head of the regional Federal Penitentiary Service, Colonel Sergei Moiseenko, whom the investigation considers the mastermind of the crime, and 63-year-old St. Petersburg resident Sabir Sadykov, who is called the perpetrator.

After documents about the long-term construction fell into the hands of investigators, the Investigative Committee opened a criminal case for fraud in the construction of a non-existent road to a new pre-trial detention center. We are talking about a government contract worth 16 million rubles. In December last year, certain “unidentified persons” on behalf of the contractor allegedly submitted to the Federal Penitentiary Service reports on work completed in the amount of more than 11 million rubles. The Federal Penitentiary Service immediately transferred the money, but the road to Krestov-2 did not appear on the map.

Then the former general director of the general contractor company GSK OJSC, Viktor Kudrin, was also detained on suspicion of embezzling budget money during the construction of Krestov-2. According to the Investigative Committee, from 2007 to 2015, JSC GSK received more than 12.2 billion rubles under the contract for the construction of Krestov-2, but the work was not completed. Viktor Kudrin himself stole 56 million rubles and disposed of them at his own discretion, the Investigative Committee believes.

Then the general director of the subcontractor, the Petroinvest company, Ruslan Khamkhokov was detained; the investigation believes that Colonel Sergei Moiseenko in March 2010 invited Khamkhokov to sign acceptance certificates for uncompleted work for 10% of each government contract. As a result, over the course of five years, Khamkhokov gave Moiseenko bribes totaling 350 million rubles, according to the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee for St. Petersburg.

At the same time, the 12-billion-dollar insulator itself still has not seen the end of construction. The leadership of the FSIN promises to commission it by the end of the year, but similar promises were made in 2016.

Another curator of the pre-trial detention center in St. Petersburg, former deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service Nikolai Barinov, was detained.

He joined the list of functionaries and businessmen who, according to investigators, chose personal enrichment over a matter of national importance - the construction of the Kresty-2 pre-trial detention center, which is ultra-modern by Russian standards and the largest in Europe. The ten-year unfinished construction began with Vladimir Putin and will end with him.

1 European standards

The crosses on Arsenalnaya Embankment were opened in 1892. The name was given by the shape of two five-story buildings. The institution operated as a solitary prison, and even then, in Tsarist Russia, modern European living space standards were observed - seven square meters per person. After the 1917 revolution, ministers, gendarmes and police officers were kept in Kresty. In Soviet times, “compaction” began; two people were put into solitary confinement. By the 2000s, Kresty was suffering from overcrowding.

2 Meeting on the Neva

During Vladimir Putin’s visit to St. Petersburg in May 2006, then-governor Valentina Matvienko, conducting a boat tour, pointed out the Crosses to the president and complained about the problem. Putin instructed the Russian Ministry of Justice to develop a plan to move the detention center from the center of St. Petersburg. This is how an ambitious plan emerged for the construction of the largest pre-trial detention center in Europe, also designed in the shape of crosses. It received the working title "Crosses-2". The first report of Justice Minister Ustinov to Putin was dated February 2007.

$3,500 million

A federal target program was created to finance Krestov-2. At 2007 exchange rates, $500 million (12 billion rubles) were allocated for the project.

In 2007, the public was presented with a plan for a pre-trial detention center - for 4,000 places, with a sports complex and a shooting range, a five-story medical unit, a fire station, a garage for forty cars and an enclosure for the same number of dogs. Each prisoner is royally allocated seven square meters of living space, while the existing norm in Russia is four “squares” per person.

The General Construction Corporation (GSK) of Viktor Kudrin was chosen as the general contractor, and Petroinvest of Ruslan Khamkhokov was chosen as the general subcontractor. Both companies received 6 billion rubles each and divided the scope of work.

4 Curator

Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service Nikolai Barinov was appointed supervisor of the construction. Taking office in August 2005, he began his activities with a charitable purpose. In May 2006, the Russian Orthodox Church donated religious literature to correctional institutions. “We are confident that this action will help those who have stumbled find the key to their soul, embark on the path of correction and through this reach the desired goal - liberation,” commented Nikolai Ivanovich.

In 2008, the first piles were driven at the site of Krestov-2. Barinov led the ceremony. He promised to hand over the detention center by May 2013.

5 Kickbacks

According to the Investigative Committee, already at the dawn of construction, budget money was actively divided for the purpose of personal enrichment. Barinov, judging by the statement of the investigation, from May to August 2007 put forward a demand to Ruslan Khamkhokov to transfer 12 percent of each money transfer to the Petroinvest bank account, and only in this case would he sign documents on the work performed. From October 2007 to December 2012, the deputy director of the Federal Penitentiary Service allegedly repeatedly received bribes in a total amount of at least 110 million rubles. In total, judging by the materials of the criminal case against Khamkhokov, he transferred 350 million in bribes.

6 Litigation

By 2016, after repeated postponements of the delivery of Krestov-2, Kudrina’s GSK and Khamkhokov’s Petroinvest had a huge quarrel. They made mutual claims, tried to bankrupt each other, and by the beginning of 2017, construction had almost stopped. The head of the Federal Penitentiary Service of St. Petersburg and the region, Igor Potapenko, stated that not a single ruble more would be allocated for Kresty-2. 12 billion were given to businessmen, the shortage at the site was estimated at 1.2 billion.

7 Murder

In March 2017, in the Vsevolozhsk region, the body of Federal Penitentiary Service Lieutenant Colonel Nikolai Chernov was found with multiple gunshot wounds. He carried out a check at Kresty-2, and the murder for official reasons was confirmed. Deputy head of the Federal Penitentiary Service Sergei Moiseenko was detained on suspicion of organizing the crime; businessman Sobir Sadykov is considered the perpetrator. They are both arrested.

After Chernov's murder, numerous arrests followed. The head of GSK Kudrin is accused of embezzlement and fraud amounting to 100 million rubles. Khamkhokov was arrested in early September for giving a bribe of 350 million. The current deputy director of the FSIN, Oleg Korshunov (oversaw Crosses-2 after Barinov’s resignation), was detained in the case of embezzlement in the purchase of fuels and lubricants for the needs of the department.

After Chernov’s murder, the Federal Security Service, its key department “M”, which oversees the activities of law enforcement agencies, took over the operational support of the Kresty-2 case.

8 The insulator is waiting

The new official date for the move of Kresty to Kresty-2 is December 1, 2017. The first guests may be those who built and supervised the isolation ward. The rich equipment of the pre-trial detention center suits them. Ruslan Khamkhokov - Lieutenant General of the Reserve of the Ministry of Defense, former head of the North-Western Directorate of Spetsstroy of Russia.

Colonel Sergei Moiseenko, in addition to organizing the murder, is also accused of receiving 350 million rubles.

Nikolai Barinov is next in line. He currently holds the position of adviser to the head of Rosreestr. He lived well. For 2016, he declared an income of 9.6 million rubles, a 130-meter apartment, Volkswagen Multivan, Renault Kangoo, Moskvich-407 cars, and an all-terrain vehicle. His wife turned out to be wealthier. With an annual salary of just over a million rubles, she owns six plots of land with a total area of ​​eight thousand square meters, a residential building, three garages, an Audi A7, Jeep Grand Cherokee, and Nissan Murano.

9 Three chefs on Kresty-2

Kresty-2 survived three directors of the Federal Penitentiary Service. Their fates turned out differently. Yuri Kalinin (2004 - 2009), during whose tenure the project began, successfully works as deputy chairman of the board and vice president of Rosneft. Alexander Reimer (2009 - 2012) was sentenced to eight years in prison for embezzling billions from the purchase of electronic bracelets. His replacement, Gennady Kornienko, found himself in an unenviable role. He was responsible for all the failures in the delivery of Krestov-2, he had to sign an appeal requesting the dismissal of his deputy Oleg Korshunov, who had recently been in charge of the construction, and he was forced to officially admit the depravity of the financial, economic and construction blocks of his department, organizing repressions in the ranks . According to Fontanka’s interlocutors, Gennady Kornienko will welcome the opening of Krestov-2 in office, but the reputational costs are too high. The resignation of the Colonel General, if it takes place, will have to be signed by Vladimir Putin.